Headlines headlines
View news itemSTEC seeks Psychologist to Join Committee
STEC, as part of SASC, is seeking a psychologist to join the SpLD Test Evaluation ...
View news itemReview of Adult Reading Test (ART)
Update on revised guidance relating to the Adult Reading Test [ART] has been released by ...
View news itemUpdated Test Guidance issued December 2104
Updated Test Guidance issued December 2014, see SpLD Assessment page.
View news itemComments sought on DSA Draft Guidance
Student Loans Company have extended the date to receive comments to 14 January 2015.
View news itemBIS releases updates on DSA for 2015-16
Students with dyslexia will still be eligible to apply for and receive DSA funding. Draft ...

SASC news feed SASC news feed


SpLD assessment tools

The list of suitable tests for the assessment of specific learning difficulties (SpLD) in Higher Education is a key part of the National Assessment Framework for Applications for Disabled Students' Allowances. The purpose of the list is to promote quality and consistency in the Disabled Students' Allowances (DSA) process. 

[Please note: This list is specifically aimed at students 16 and over. There are a significant number of other assessment materials that will be relevant to younger ages. You should be looking to evaluate them in terms of their reliability, validity, standardisation sample and the area they assess is relevant to your needs.]

STEC [SpLD Test Evaluation Committee] 

STEC is a sub-committee of the SPLD Assessment Standards Committee (SASC). Its purpose is to provide guidance on assessment materials to SASC. Its responsibilities are:

  •      To review and evaluate assessment materials on a regular basis.
  •      To revise and update the test recommendations of the SpLD Working Group 2005/DfES Guidelines.
  •      To maintain a list of approved assessment materials for SpLDs in higher education.
  •     To engage with the publishers and distributors of assessment materials.
  •      To carry out other business as advised by and agreed with SASC.
  •      To report to SASC on a regular basis, including an annual written report to be submitted to SASC‘s AGM by the Chair.

STEC is seeking a Psychologist to Join the Committee

We are seeking a psychologist to join the SpLD Test Evaluation Committee who is: 

  • A registered practitioner with the HCPC 
  • Chartered (British Psychological Society) 
Before considering application it is advisable to view the SASC website, www.sasc.org.uk where documents relevant to the work of STEC and SASC can be found: 

  • The SpLD working Group/DfES Guidelines 
  • Updated Assessment Guidance 
  • STEC Terms of Reference 

If you are interested please send to Hilary Dinham at hilarydinham@btinternet.com as WORD or PDF documents by the end of June:

  •   a full CV
  •   at least one anonymised diagnostic report for DSA completed within the last year  
  •   a brief statement of how you consider you would contribute to the work of STEC
  •   evidence of relevant CPD in past three years.
  • Please download from this page, the Advert for Psychologist for STEC for a full description of the role and application process.

    STEC updated guidance and other relevant documents can be accessed from here. Updated guidance has been released, December 2014 and is downloadable from this page. Interim updates are below.

    Please share this advice with colleagues and other stakeholders.

    Review of Adult Reading Test (ART)

    In 2014 STEC began to review some of the older tests that have been on the list for some time with a view to assessing whether or they should still remain on the list of suitable tests for the assessment of specific learning difficulties in higher education. This list is referred to by assessors, university disability services, university examinations departments and Student Finance England to ensure that diagnostic reports provide valid evidence for reasonable adjustments and the Disabled Students’ Allowance.

    STEC conducts a full review of a test before making any changes to the list. This review includes

    Ø  the date of standardisation,

    Ø  the availability of standard, scaled, composite or other scores for each subtest,

    Ø  the size and spread of the standardisation sample,

    Ø  whether the presence of SpLD is identified in a SpLD sample group,

    Ø  the content, concurrent and construct validity of the test

    Ø  and the reliability data.

    In the case of the ART, concerns were raised about the standardisation of the test but it was recognised that the test can still be useful for diagnostic purposes.  It was therefore agreed that ART can still be used, but only qualitatively, and the wording on the Test List was amended accordingly.

    Assessors are also reminded of the guidance that precedes the test list, a summary of which can be found on page 2.

    STEC is aware that assessors of students with specific learning difficulties in the UK are very keen to see UK standardised tests of reading and writing speed, reading comprehension and reading accuracy suitable for use in a higher education setting come to the market, particularly if they include a standardisation sample of students with EAL and/or SpLDs.

    STEC was therefore very pleased to hear from the authors of ART that the test is undergoing a re-standardisation and we look forward to reviewing the newly published test when it is available. [Update March 2015]

    Maintaining test standards.

    SASC advises it is best practice for assessors not to put examples from test papers of errors in reports at all. Advice for training and assessments should be to not state test items, but only give examples of types of errors being made. Assessors are also  reminded that working papers from assessments should not be made available as these could affect the standardisation of the test. [update issued August 2014]

    TOMAL 2 [Test of Memory and Learning, 2nd edition]

    All 5 subtests of the Attention/Concentration Index [ACI] should ideally be administered to enable a fully accurate composite to be calculated.  If for any reason a subtest score has been prorated it would be important for the assessor to clearly indicate in the report that the ACI score has been prorated and hence can only be used for a ‘statistical rather than a clinical purpose’ (TOMAL2 p.59).  The manual (p.59) also states ‘Although composites scores that contain a prorated value may be profiled, a specific prorated subtest standard score should neither be profiled nor taken as a reflection of an examinee’s memory performance on the subtest the prorated score represent.’ Consequently, we would not recommend that the individual subtest prorated score is documented in the report. [update issued August 2014]

    Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence® - Second Edition (WASI®-II)  The WASI II is acceptable for DSA assessments in all areas the WASI I was listed. The WASI II is an updated version of the assessment battery. The WASI I is still acceptable as long as the forms are available.

    Woodcock-Reading Mastery Tests: 3rd Edition (WRMT-III).  Pearson. 5-75+ years

    STEC approve the revised edition of this test battery with the following cautionary note:


    In the absence of the publishers/importers providing (a) a re-standardisation to accommodate UK culture and normative standards and (b) guidance/substituted materials on word/picture/phrase substitutions for Americanisms and other cultural features, STEC advises users to apply the necessary caution when administering the test.  Notwithstanding this point, it is STEC’s view that it considers this test useful and appropriate to administer for the purposes intended.

    STEC response to recent debate about WRIT

    The purpose of an ability test is to eliminate general learning difficulties and to examine potential – the WRIT can do both. A comparison between the WRIT and the WAIS is not particularly helpful as Verbal Analogies and Similarities are not measuring the same thing. Most people using the WRIT are well aware that there is some cultural bias as the test was not developed in the UK.

    Tests don't diagnose, people do'. An assessment is a differential diagnosis which uses a battery of tests to come to a conclusion about strengths and weaknesses and does not rely on any individual test for a diagnosis. Specialist Dyslexia Assessors do not only rely on the WRIT scores or a working memory deficit to make a diagnosis of dyslexia. They use data from other tests and take into account the verbal abilities of the student throughout the whole assessment process, noting receptive and expressive language skills. The assessment will also look at difficulties with working memory, phonological weakness and speed of processing, literacy weaknesses and specific skills associated with reading and writing. Additional testing may be carried out if supplementary evidence is required.

    Terms of Reference and Minutes of STEC meetings are accessible from the downloads page.